Skip to content

Liberal Hero of the Week #22: Chris Skidmore MP

November 22, 2012

ImageWelcome to the 22nd in our series, Liberal Hero of the Week, chosen by Stephen Tall, Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and Research Associate at CentreForum. ‘Liberal Heroes’ showcases those who promote the four liberal tenets identified in The Orange Book — economic, personal, political and social liberalism — highlighting individuals regardless of party affiliation and from beyond Westminster. If they stick up for liberalism then they’re in contention.

Chris Skidmore

Conservative MP for Kingswood
Reason: For recognising the unfairness that even the richest pensioners receive tax-free universal benefits.

“We will keep the free television licence, we will keep the pension credit, the winter fuel allowance and the free bus pass. Those letters you’ve been getting from Labour are pure and simple lies … They make me really very, very, angry.” David Cameron’s defensive outburst in the 2010 televised general election debates has boxed the Prime Minister into a corner. While preaching ‘we’re all in it together’ austerity, the Tory leader finds himself in the awkward position of defending the fact that 988,000 millionaire pensioners receive a tax-free winter fuel allowance.

So credit to Tory MP Chris Skidmore, a member of the Tory party’s 39-strong Free Enterprise Group, for sticking his head above the parapet to call out this anomaly for what it is: a scandalous misuse of scarce taxpayers’ money. In a new publication, A New Beveridge: 70 years on – refounding the 21st century welfare state, he argues:

Money will need to be more effectively targeted to those in need, rather than the current situation where millionaires can collect the winter fuel allowance. Just as the government has removed child benefit from the wealthiest households earning over £50-60,000, so we should do the same with universal pensioner benefits, meaning that the richest pensioners with separate incomes over £50,000 should no longer receive winter fuel allowance, a free bus pass and free TV licenses.

Chris Skidmore is right in principle. But there is a reform which would be simple, practical, fair — and would even allow David Cameron to say, legitimately, that he had upheld his election pledge. It would also avoid the bureaucratic expense that it is often feared will accompany means-testing of benefits. It was proposed this week in CentreForum’s alternative Autumn Statement:

Pensioners have benefited from an array of universal benefits in recent years. This includes free bus passes at 61, winter fuel payments at 61 (increased for over 80s), and free colour TV licences at 75. The total cost of these non-means tested benefits in 2011–12 was around £3.8 billion. In common with other universal benefits, this includes a level of leakage to wealthier pensioner households that is unacceptable in current economic circumstances.

The most effective and equitable way of reducing these disproportionate benefits would be to treat their cash value as income, and tax this income at the appropriate marginal rate. Even if that were not possible for TV licences and bus passes (especially given the varying benefit conferred by the latter), £230 million a year would be raised by taxing winter fuel payments. Those with incomes below the personal allowance – which is £10,500 for over 65s and slightly higher for over 75s – would be entirely unaffected.

Taxing these benefits is likely to garner broad based support. Even Ros Altmann of Saga, a staunch advocate of universality, has said she does “not understand why winter fuel payments and some other benefits are tax free. Revenue could be raised by making them taxable”.

The fuel payments would continue to help out those low-income pensioners for which the benefit was always intended, while those with higher incomes would pay tax on it according to their means. David Cameron would have saved face and the Coalition could drop some of its ill-considered benefits cuts, such as its proposals to cut council tax benefit.

* You can view our list of ‘Liberal Heroes of the Week’ (and occasional ‘Liberal Villains’) here. Nominations are welcome via email or Twitter.

6 Comments leave one →
  1. November 26, 2012 1:29 pm

    Is this the same Chris Skidmore that wants unemployment benefits for under 25s to be paid back when/if the recipient finds work? They’ll be wrapped in a cycle of debt and misery for the rest of their lives. And multi-millionaires will continue to be given tax cuts by their benefactor, the chancellor.
    Some hero!

  2. November 27, 2012 2:20 am

    Just want to second Sian Chetty’s comment. Skidmore is not a hero. In his telegraph article summarising his proposal for JSA to become a loan, he claimed that democracies only work “until the majority discovers that it can vote itself largesse from the public treasury”. So in Skidmore’s world, not only are the poor living the high life on benefits, but their tendency to do so suggests a structural flaw with the entire democratic process! His ideas really belong back with Edmund Burke and his talk of the ‘swinish multitude’. Not a hero, just another reactionary desperate to intensify the misery of the British working class.

    • November 27, 2012 11:51 am

      Thank you, DTS. You spoke eloquently there. It shows that this Tory and his cohorts in Parliament don’t even bother to hide their contempt for the poor, sick, disabled, the homeless, the working classes and plebs(as Mitchell says)…..who put all the money into the treasury. While we have taxes taken out of our wages at source, Cameron and Osbourne are ensuring that their mates are feathering their nests with tax avoidance schemes because they don’t tell the taxman what they actually earn. And I hope that Clegg has his ‘Portillo moment’ in 2015 when he loses his seat by a huge majority. Until then, I suggest he takes a long hard look in the mirror and see what a liar looks like.

  3. November 28, 2012 11:37 am

    Thanks Sian and ‘duringthestrike’ for commenting but you seem to have missed the point of the Liberal Hero series. We recognise specific arguments people make *regardless* of their other views with which I (or CentreForum) may disagree.

    On housing benefit, for instance, CentreForum’s then-chief economist Tim Leunig was highly critical of the Government’s plans to remove it from under-25s:

  4. March 8, 2013 10:42 pm

    Fantastic read! I’ve updated your rss feeds to my Google account.


  1. Your essential weekend reader — 12 must-read articles you may have missed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,684 other followers

%d bloggers like this: